Demographic Dimensions


Demographic Dimensions is a modeling database at the block group and higher levels of geography that is useful in creating statistical models, site signature reports, and general executive summary information.  Unlike discrete neighborhood classification systems, Demographic Dimensions provides continuous measurement scores across the dominant demographic components that differentiate neighborhoods.

 

Demographic Dimensions is based on the well-known data reduction tool of Principal Components Analysis, in which the common patterns found within a large number of variables are reduced to a core set of discriminating factors.   By analyzing several hundred separate demographic variables at the block group level, sixteen dominant factors were identified.  Together, these factors provide insights into the core dimensions of neighborhood differentiation.

 

The Dimensions database is normally provided as a set of continuous variables which are minimally auto correlated and have a mean of zero and unit variance for the U.S.   For example, a value of +1 means one Standard Deviation away from the mean which indicates this is a significant variable.

 

Factors are useful in a broad spectrum of applications, including:

 

  • Direct Marketing


    Demographic Dimensions, when used in conjunction with Mosaic and other targeting tools, can yield significant improvements in direct marketing results.  By fine-tuning a Mosaic profile, sub-groups of Mosaic segments can be targeted effectively.

 

  • Model Development


    Dimensions are minimally correlated and are therefore very suitable for use in the construction of sales performance and site location models.    Statistical models developed using Factors tend to be less prone to prediction error as a result of multicolinearity.

 

  • Neighborhood Description
    Factors can be used to effectively describe the dominant characteristics of neighborhoods for use in demographic reporting systems.    Site “signatures” are easily defined and analyzed, since each of these factors is independent and reflect the dominant neighborhood differentiators.

 

Methodology

Several hundred input variables were used in the analysis, which are summarized below by type of variable and source year.    Note that in many cases, both average (or median) and distribution data were used (e.g. median age, % population age < 18, etc.).   In most cases, with the exception of the housing characteristics tables, these are for current year rather than Census only.

 

Geographic Characteristics

  • Urban core / urban fringe / rural Census classification

  • Metropolitan status (e.g. metro, non-metropolitan area)

  • Housing Characteristics

  • Units in structure (e.g. single family detached, apts 20+) Dwelling age

  • Tenure

  • Vacant dwellings by reason (e.g. seasonally vacant)

  • Boarded up status (boarded up / not boarded up)

  • Owner occupied dwellings by value

  • Households by rent

  • Dwellings by number of rooms

  • Dwellings by heating type

  • Dwellings by water service and sewage service

 

Household Characteristics

  • By type (family, non-family)

  • By size of household

  • By structure (e.g. married couple w children)

  • By age of householder

  • By length of residence (e.g. < 1 year, …. 10+ years)

 

Population Characteristics

  • Recent and historical growth (1970-2000)

  • Projected growth (2000-2010)

  • Density

  • Age

  • Sex

  • Race

  • Hispanic origin

  • Detailed Hispanic Origin (e.g. Mexico, Puerto Rico)

  • Marital status

  • Highest level of education

  • Language spoken at home (% Spanish, % Asian)

  • School enrolment (public versus private)

  • Number of vehicles available

 

Labor Force

  • Employment status (e.g. employed, unemployed)

  • Industry

  • Occupation

  • Employment of women with children

  • Unemployment rate

  • Travel time to work

  • Means of transportation to work

 

Income

  • Sources of income (e.g. social security, wage and salary)

  • Households by income

  • Households by disposable income

  • Households by net worth

  • Households by income growth (1990-2000)

  • Households by income by age of householder

 

Demographic Dimensions’ Variables

01 Affluence     
Affluence is the single most important neighborhood discriminator and is most highly skewed.  Affluence includes more than just income – it also reflects net worth, home ownership, and housing value and size.

 

02 Family Status          
Family status, or household structure, is the second most important neighborhood differentiator.   Ranging from areas populated with lone householders to married couple families with children, this factor varies most dramatically over the metropolitan scale.

 

03 Occupational Status 
This factor measures the distinction between blue collar and white-collar occupations and lifestyles.   Suburban, upscale neighborhoods of executives and professionals are contrasted with the blue-collar neighborhoods of smaller industrial towns and inner cities.

 

04 Aging          
This important factor correlates highly with both the median age of residents and the percentage of residents over the age of 65.   Residents in areas with high positive scores are most likely to be retired and receiving Social Security benefits, and often live alone.   Residents in areas with high negative scores are likely to be young adults, often single, without children.

 

05 African-American      
Areas with high scores consist of neighborhoods that are predominantly African-American.   This factor tends to vary both at a metropolitan scale and regionally, with strong concentrations in the deep south and in the industrial cities of the northeast.

 

06 Mexican-American    
The growth of the largely Mexican origin Hispanic population drives this increasingly important discriminating factor, which scores highest in the southwest states bordering Mexico.

 

07 Housing Style          
This factor relates to the continuum of neighborhoods from single-family dwellings through dense high-rise apartment complexes.   

 

08 Agricultural Dominance         
Once the dominant discriminating factor of American life, the farm – non-farm dichotomy has been minimized with the wave of urbanization during the last century.   High scores tend to occur in the generally rural states of the upper Great Plains and in the agricultural areas of Central California.

 

09 College Campuses   
Areas with high scores on this factor are the distinctive neighborhoods on and around college campuses.   These neighborhoods have a high percentage of young adults who have never been married, are enrolled in school, and may live in college dormitories.

 

10 Growth and Stability 
Reflects the continuum between areas of rapid growth and change and stable, older neighborhoods.   This factor highlights change areas both within metropolitan areas and at a national scale.

 

11 Seasonal Areas
Measuring the degree to which dwellings in the area are seasonally vacant, this factor is highest in the summer vacation areas of the Great Lakes and New England, the winter vacation areas of the Rocky Mountains, and on the non-urban coastlines of California and Florida.

 

12 Native American
Reflecting the distribution of Native Americans, this factor tends to be highest in the plains and southwest states, as well as Alaska.

 

13 Asian-American
Areas with high scores consist of neighborhoods that are predominantly Asian.   Geographic variability is both at a metropolitan scale and regionally, with strong concentrations on the west coast and Hawaii.

 

14 Institutional
Areas scoring high on this factor are related to institutional land use – including both correctional facilities and long term care hospitals.

 

15 Language Barriers
Scores on this factor are high in areas where recent immigrants, often unable to speak English, have settled.   Reflecting recent immigration trends, Spanish tends to be spoken in these neighborhoods.

 

16 Military
Areas scoring high on this factor include both military bases and the nearby youthful and mobile neighborhoods that house military personnel.

 

Using Demographic Signatures

Locations that have values 1 or greater (Standard Deviation away from the mean of zero) indicate that the area is significant in terms of that dimension.  If this area also has high sales of your product or service, then you could use PCensus to look for other areas with the same demographic signature.

 

Demographic Dimensions Variable List

 

Pricing

Level of Data Size "A" Size "B" Size "C" Size "D" United States County or CBSA
Block Group* $225. $300. $375. $450. $1,500. $150/$300.
Census Tract†  $115. $150. $185. $225. $750.  
Zip Code‡ $115. $150. $185. $225. $750.
Place   $375.
County $250.

 

Size "A" States

Size "B" States

Size "C" States

Size "D" States

Alaska, Arizona, Delaware, D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Wyoming Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Washington, West Virginia Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin California, Florida, Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas

 

Notes:

* Block Group Data also includes Census Tract, County, Place and State level data.
†  Census Tract Data also includes Country and State level data.
‡  Zip Code data also includes County and State level data.

 

AGS is a trademark of Applied Geographic Solutions, Thousand Oaks, CA