|
|
Demographic Dimensions is a modeling database at the block group and
higher levels of geography that is useful in creating statistical
models, site signature reports, and general executive summary
information. Unlike discrete neighborhood classification systems,
Demographic Dimensions provides continuous measurement scores across the
dominant demographic components that differentiate neighborhoods.
Demographic Dimensions is based on the
well-known data reduction tool of Principal Components Analysis, in which
the common patterns found within a large number of variables are reduced to
a core set of discriminating factors. By analyzing several
hundred separate demographic variables at the block group level, sixteen
dominant factors were identified. Together, these factors provide
insights into the core dimensions of neighborhood differentiation.
The Dimensions database is
normally provided as a set of continuous variables which are minimally auto
correlated and have a mean of zero and unit variance for the U.S.
For example, a value of +1 means one Standard Deviation away from the mean
which indicates this is a significant variable.
Factors are useful in a broad
spectrum of applications, including:
-
Direct Marketing
Demographic Dimensions, when
used in conjunction with Mosaic and other targeting tools, can yield
significant improvements in direct marketing results. By fine-tuning a
Mosaic profile, sub-groups of Mosaic segments can be targeted effectively.
-
Model Development
Dimensions are minimally
correlated and are therefore very suitable for use in the construction of
sales performance and site location models. Statistical
models developed using Factors tend to be less prone to prediction error as
a result of multicolinearity.
-
Neighborhood Description Factors can be used to
effectively describe the dominant characteristics of neighborhoods for use
in demographic reporting systems. Site “signatures” are
easily defined and analyzed, since each of these factors is independent and
reflect the dominant neighborhood differentiators.
Methodology
Several hundred input variables were
used in the analysis, which are summarized below by type of variable and
source year. Note that in many cases, both average (or
median) and distribution data were used (e.g. median age, % population age <
18, etc.). In most cases, with the exception of the housing
characteristics tables, these are for current year rather than Census only.
Geographic Characteristics
-
Urban core / urban fringe
/ rural Census classification
-
Metropolitan status (e.g.
metro, non-metropolitan area)
-
Housing Characteristics
-
Units in structure (e.g.
single family detached, apts 20+) Dwelling age
-
Tenure
-
Vacant dwellings by
reason (e.g. seasonally vacant)
-
Boarded up status
(boarded up / not boarded up)
-
Owner occupied dwellings
by value
-
Households by rent
-
Dwellings by number of
rooms
-
Dwellings by heating type
-
Dwellings by water
service and sewage service
Household Characteristics
-
By type (family,
non-family)
-
By size of household
-
By structure (e.g.
married couple w children)
-
By age of householder
-
By length of residence
(e.g. < 1 year, …. 10+ years)
Population Characteristics
-
Recent and historical growth (1970-2000)
-
Projected growth (2000-2010)
-
Density
-
Age
-
Sex
-
Race
-
Hispanic origin
-
Detailed Hispanic Origin (e.g. Mexico, Puerto
Rico)
-
Marital status
-
Highest level of education
-
Language spoken at home (% Spanish, % Asian)
-
School enrolment (public versus private)
-
Number of vehicles available
Labor Force
-
Employment status (e.g. employed, unemployed)
-
Industry
-
Occupation
-
Employment of women with children
-
Unemployment rate
-
Travel time to work
-
Means of transportation to work
Income
-
Sources of income (e.g. social security, wage
and salary)
-
Households by income
-
Households by disposable income
-
Households by net worth
-
Households by income growth (1990-2000)
-
Households by income by age of householder
Demographic Dimensions’
Variables
01 Affluence
Affluence is the single most important neighborhood discriminator and is
most highly skewed. Affluence includes more than just income – it also
reflects net worth, home ownership, and housing value and size.
02 Family Status
Family status, or household structure, is the second most important
neighborhood differentiator. Ranging from areas populated with
lone householders to married couple families with children, this factor
varies most dramatically over the metropolitan scale.
03 Occupational Status
This factor measures the distinction between blue collar and white-collar
occupations and lifestyles. Suburban, upscale neighborhoods of
executives and professionals are contrasted with the blue-collar
neighborhoods of smaller industrial towns and inner cities.
04 Aging
This important factor correlates highly with both the median age of
residents and the percentage of residents over the age of 65.
Residents in areas with high positive scores are most likely to be retired
and receiving Social Security benefits, and often live alone.
Residents in areas with high negative scores are likely to be young adults,
often single, without children.
05 African-American
Areas with high scores consist of neighborhoods that are predominantly
African-American. This factor tends to vary both at a
metropolitan scale and regionally, with strong concentrations in the deep
south and in the industrial cities of the northeast.
06 Mexican-American
The growth of the largely Mexican origin Hispanic population drives this
increasingly important discriminating factor, which scores highest in the
southwest states bordering Mexico.
07 Housing Style
This factor relates to the continuum of neighborhoods from single-family
dwellings through dense high-rise apartment complexes.
08 Agricultural Dominance
Once the dominant discriminating factor of American life, the farm –
non-farm dichotomy has been minimized with the wave of urbanization during
the last century. High scores tend to occur in the generally
rural states of the upper Great Plains and in the agricultural areas of
Central California.
09 College Campuses
Areas with high scores on this factor are the distinctive neighborhoods on
and around college campuses. These neighborhoods have a high
percentage of young adults who have never been married, are enrolled in
school, and may live in college dormitories.
10 Growth and Stability
Reflects the continuum between areas of rapid growth and change and stable,
older neighborhoods. This factor highlights change areas both
within metropolitan areas and at a national scale.
11 Seasonal Areas
Measuring the degree to which dwellings in the area are seasonally vacant,
this factor is highest in the summer vacation areas of the Great Lakes and
New England, the winter vacation areas of the Rocky Mountains, and on the
non-urban coastlines of California and Florida.
12 Native American
Reflecting the distribution of Native Americans, this factor tends to be
highest in the plains and southwest states, as well as Alaska.
13 Asian-American
Areas with high scores consist of neighborhoods that are predominantly
Asian. Geographic variability is both at a metropolitan scale
and regionally, with strong concentrations on the west coast and Hawaii.
14 Institutional
Areas scoring high on this factor are related to institutional land use –
including both correctional facilities and long term care hospitals.
15 Language Barriers
Scores on this factor are high in areas where recent immigrants, often
unable to speak English, have settled. Reflecting recent
immigration trends, Spanish tends to be spoken in these neighborhoods.
16 Military
Areas scoring high on this factor include both military bases and the nearby
youthful and mobile neighborhoods that house military personnel.
Using Demographic Signatures
Locations that have
values 1 or greater (Standard Deviation away from the mean of zero) indicate
that the area is significant in terms of that dimension. If this area
also has high sales of your product or service, then you could use PCensus
to look for other areas with the same demographic signature.
Demographic Dimensions Variable List
Pricing
| Level of Data |
Size "A" |
Size "B" |
Size "C" |
Size "D" |
United States |
County or CBSA |
| Block Group* |
$225. |
$300. |
$375. |
$450. |
$1,500. |
$150/$300. |
| Census Tract†
|
$115. |
$150. |
$185. |
$225. |
$750. |
|
| Zip Code‡ |
$115. |
$150. |
$185. |
$225. |
$750. |
| Place |
|
$375. |
| County |
$250. |
Size "A"
States |
Size "B"
States |
Size "C"
States |
Size "D"
States |
| Alaska, Arizona, Delaware,
D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon,
Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Wyoming |
Alabama, Colorado,
Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Washington, West Virginia |
Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, North
Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin |
California, Florida,
Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Texas |
Notes: * Block Group Data also includes Census Tract,
County, Place and State level data.
†
Census Tract Data also includes Country and
State level data.
‡
Zip Code data also includes County and
State level data.
AGS is a trademark of Applied Geographic Solutions,
Thousand Oaks, CA
|

More Information
Other Demographics
Related Products
|